If you have a strong stomach, click here...
Van Helsing : Biden: Panic!
Anybody else notice the only death in America was an illegal immigrant child from Mexico? Andy McCarthy Mark Steyn : Undocumented Flu
|
« March 2009 | Main | May 2009 »
Van Helsing : Biden: Panic!
Anybody else notice the only death in America was an illegal immigrant child from Mexico? Andy McCarthy Mark Steyn : Undocumented Flu
|
Posted in Politics | Permalink | Comments (4) | TrackBack (0)
Posted in Politics | Permalink | Comments (5) | TrackBack (0)
61 years-ago today the state of Israel was born from the ashes of the Holocaust, I remain proud-as-ever to stand by her side, God bless Israel......
Tel Aviv - Israel will not compromise on its security, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu vowed Tuesday, as the country commemorated the over 22,000 soldiers and civilians killed in wars or attacks since Israel's foundation and the years leading up to it.
'Never will we forsake our fate again. Never will we lose our defensive force. Our hand is extended in peace to all of our neighbors, but our enemies ought not to misconstrue us,' he said at an official memorial ceremony at Jerusalem's Mount Herzl cemetery.
Exactly 22,570 soldiers and civilians have died in wars against Israel and attacks on Jews, since Jews set up their first neighbourhood outside the wall of Jerusalem's Old City in 1860.
The 24-hour commemoration ends Tuesday night, when massive celebrations marking Israel's 61st anniversary begin throughout the country.
Israel traditionally marks its Independence Day a week after its national Holocaust Memorial Day - to symbolize its rebirth from the ashes of the attempted Nazi genocide of the Jews of Europe - and immediately after its Memorial Day for Fallen Soldiers, a reminder that statehood came at a price.
Posted in Politics | Permalink | Comments (2) | TrackBack (0)

It happens every time a president leaves town to make an Earth Day speech. Reporters scramble to point out how much fuel was expended so the President could talk about conserving energy and using alternative fuels. In flying to and from Iowa today, President Obama took two flights on Air Force One and four on Marine One.
The press office at Andrews AFB wouldn’t give me the fuel consumption numbers for the 747 that serves as Air Force One without the approval of the White House Press Office, which as I write this has yet to be given.
But Boeing says its 747 burns about 5 gallons of fuel per mile. It’s 895 miles from Washington to Des Moines, so a round trip brings the fuel consumption for the fixed-wing portion of the President’s trip to 8,950 gallons.

The trip also put President Obama on Marine One for round-trip flights between the White House and Andrews AFB and between Des Moines International Airport and Newton, Iowa, site of his Earth Day speech. It totaled about an hour of flight time. The VH-3D that serves as Marine One consumes about 1200 pounds of fuel per hour which comes out to about 166 gallons consumed flying the President today.
Not included in these calculations are the presidential vehicles that took him the short distance from the landing zone in Newton to the event site at the Trinity Structural Towers Manufacturing Plant.
In his speech there, President Obama called for a “new era of energy exploration in America.”
At a plant that manufactures the towers for wind turbines, he urged Americans to support his plan for promoting expanded use of alternative and renewable fuels.
And he announced that for the first time, the Interior Department would be leasing federal waters for projects to generate electricity from wind and ocean currents.
President Obama could have saved at least 9,116 gallons of fuel by giving his speech at the White House – but no wind turbines are manufactured there.
Posted in Politics | Permalink | Comments (6) | TrackBack (0)
April 22nd, 2009
From Fox News:
Fidel Castro: Obama ‘Misinterpreted’ Raul’s Words
Wednesday, April 22, 2009
HAVANA — Fidel Castro said Tuesday that President Barack Obama "misinterpreted" his brother Raul’s sentiments toward the United States and bristled at any suggestion Cuba should free political prisoners or reduce official fees on money sent to the island from the U.S.
Raul Castro touched off a whirlwind of speculation that the U.S. and Cuba could be headed toward a thaw in nearly a half-century of chilly relations last week, when he said Cuban leaders would be willing to sit down with their U.S. counterparts and discuss "everything," including human rights, freedom of the press and expression, and political prisoners on the island.
Obama responded at the Summit of the Americas by saying Washington seeks a new beginning with Cuba, but he also said Sunday that Cuba should release some political prisoners and reduce official taxes on remittances from the U.S. as a sign of good will.
That appeared to enrage Fidel Castro, 82, who wrote in an essay posted on a government Web site that Obama "without a doubt misinterpreted Raul’s declarations."
The former president appeared to be throwing a dose of cold water on growing expectations for improved bilateral relations — suggesting Obama had no right to dare suggest that Cuba make even small concessions. He also seemed to suggest too much was being made of Raul’s comments about discussing "everything" with U.S. authorities…
For the record, here are Mr. Castro’s complete remarks on the subject, from his blog Reflections By Comrade Fidel:
Posted in Politics | Permalink | Comments (4) | TrackBack (0)
![]() | ||||||||||||
Charles Krauthammer’s Take [NRO Staff]
From last night’s “All-Stars.”
On Obama’s performance at the Summit of the Americas:
The Obama people, after he criticizes America in Europe, and after he stands utterly silent when America's excoriated at this meeting in Trinidad, say he is planting the seeds for a new relationship.
Well, I'm watching for the flowers to bloom and the garden to grow. To me, it looks like a Chauncey gardener doctrine, that everything will happen in the future. Let's see. I'm not that sure.
The most telling moment, however, was when Daniel Ortega, the president of Nicaragua, delivered a 53-minute excoriating attack on the United States. And Obama's response was "I'm grateful that President Ortega did not blame me for the things that occurred when I was three months old."
Does the narcissism of this man know no bounds? (No, Mr. Krauthammer, apparently not) This is not about him. It is about his country. This is something that occurred under John Kennedy — the Bay of Pigs is what he is referring to. And what he is saying is that it's OK that he attacked John Kennedy, as long as it wasn't me. (exactly. Egobama cares only the HE be liked, not the US because he despises this country so why would he defend her?)
Doesn't it occur to him that he ought to defend his country even if stuff happened before him? It doesn't all start with him.
And with all of these attacks on the U.S., he said almost nothing except I don't want to engage in stale arguments. It's not a stale argument to say in one simple sentence that American policy in Cuba since Eisenhower and Kennedy has been to try to rid these people of a communist dictatorship that imposed itself by force 50 years ago.
That's all he had to say, but he couldn't, and he didn't.
Posted in Politics | Permalink | Comments (6) | TrackBack (0)
If al-Qaeda, the Taliban and the rest of the Looney Tunes brigade want to kick America to death, they had better move in quickly and grab a piece of the action before Barack Obama finishes the job himself. Never in the history of the United States has a president worked so actively against the interests of his own people - not even Jimmy Carter.
Obama's problem is that he does not know who the enemy is. To him, the enemy does not squat in caves in Waziristan, clutching automatic weapons and reciting the more militant verses from the Koran: instead, it sits around at tea parties in Kentucky quoting from the US Constitution. Obama is not at war with terrorists, but with his Republican fellow citizens. He has never abandoned the campaign trail.
That is why he opened Pandora's Box by publishing the Justice Department's legal opinions on waterboarding and other hardline interrogation techniques. He cynically subordinated the national interest to his partisan desire to embarrass the Republicans. Then he had to rush to Langley, Virginia to try to reassure a demoralized CIA that had just discovered the President of the United States was an even more formidable foe than al-Qaeda.
"Don't be discouraged by what's happened the last few weeks," he told intelligence officers. Is he kidding? Thanks to him, al-Qaeda knows the private interrogation techniques available to the US intelligence agencies and can train its operatives to withstand them - or would do so, if they had not already been outlawed.
So, next time a senior al-Qaeda hood is captured, all the CIA can do is ask him nicely if he would care to reveal when a major population centre is due to be hit by a terror spectacular, or which American city is about to be irradiated by a dirty bomb. Your view of this situation will be dictated by one simple criterion: whether or not you watched the people jumping from the twin towers.
Obama promised his CIA audience that nobody would be prosecuted for past actions. That has already been contradicted by leftist groups with a revanchist ambition to put Republicans, headed if possible by Condoleezza Rice, in the dock. Talk about playing party politics with national security. Martin Scheinin, the United Nations special investigator for human rights, claims that senior figures, including former vice president Dick Cheney, could face prosecution overseas. Ponder that - once you have got over the difficulty of locating the United Nations and human rights within the same dimension.
President Pantywaist Obama should have thought twice before sitting down to play poker with Dick Cheney. The former vice president believes documents have been selectively published and that releasing more will prove how effective the interrogation techniques were. Under Dubya's administration, there was no further atrocity on American soil after 9/11.
President Pantywaist's recent world tour, cosying up to all the bad guys, excited the ambitions of America's enemies. Here, they realised, is a sucker they can really take to the cleaners. His only enemies are fellow Americans. Which prompts the question: why does President Pantywaist hate America so badly?
Posted in Politics | Permalink | Comments (6) | TrackBack (0)

He bowed to the Saudi King. He wants to meet with the Thug-In-Chief. He called Hugo Chavez "my friend." But Barack Obama has apparently refused to meet with Benjamin Netanyahu.
"Netanyahu won't attend AIPAC summit, asks Peres to represent Israel," from the Jerusalem Post, April 19 (thanks to Pamela):
Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu on Sunday canceled his plans to attend the upcoming AIPAC summit, after it became clear that US President Barack Obama would not meet him during the conference.
Netanyahu announced that while he will not attend the conference in person, he will send a video-taped message to Washington....
Posted in Politics | Permalink | Comments (5) | TrackBack (0)

Posted in Politics | Permalink | Comments (5) | TrackBack (0)
Written by Dr. Jack Wheeler
|
|
Friday, 17 April 2009 |
|
All of us want to
raise our glass the highest this week to the Navy SEALs who popped those
three Somali pirates. And I'm sure you want to hear the real story of
what happened. Especially because there is a revoltingly
opportunistic and cowardly side to it. Guess which side Zero is on. |
Posted in Politics | Permalink | Comments (3) | TrackBack (0)
ZIP

Posted in Culture | Permalink | Comments (9) | TrackBack (0)

On the day the new Congress convened this year, Sen. Dianne Feinstein introduced legislation to route $25 billion in taxpayer money to a government agency that had just awarded her husband's real estate firm a lucrative contract to sell foreclosed properties at compensation rates higher than the industry norms, the Washington Times reported on Tuesday.
Mrs. Feinstein's intervention on behalf of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. was unusual: the California Democrat isn't a member of the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs with jurisdiction over FDIC; and the agency is supposed to operate from money it raises from bank-paid insurance payments - not direct federal dollars.
Documents reviewed by The Washington Times show Mrs. Feinstein first offered Oct. 30 to help the FDIC secure money for its effort to stem the rise of home foreclosures. Her letter was sent just days before the agency determined that CB Richard Ellis Group (CBRE) - the commercial real estate firm that her husband Richard Blum heads as board chairman - had won the competitive bidding for a contract to sell foreclosed properties that FDIC had inherited from failed banks.
About the same time of the contract award, Mr. Blum's private investment firm reported to the Securities and Exchange Commission that it and related affiliates had purchased more than 10 million new shares in CBRE. The shares were purchased for the going price of $3.77; CBRE's stock closed Monday at $5.14.
Spokesmen for the FDIC, Mrs. Feinstein and Mr. Blum's firm told The Times that there was no connection between the legislation and the contract signed Nov. 13, and that the couple didn't even know about CBRE's business with FDIC until after it was awarded.
Senate ethics rules state that members must avoid conflicts of interest as well as "even the appearance of a conflict of interest." Some ethics analysts question whether Mrs. Feinstein ran afoul of the latter provision, creating the appearance that she was rewarding the agency that had just hired her husband's firm.
Posted in Politics | Permalink | Comments (3) | TrackBack (0)
Welcome to the club.....
France has been cooing along with everyone else over the arrival of Bo Obama at the White House, but the master of America's new First Dog is no longer in good odour with President Sarkozy.
Mr Sarkozy is pouring cold water on President Obama's efforts to recast American leadership on the world stage, depicting them as unoriginal, unsubstantial and overrated.
Behind leaks and briefings from the Elysée Palace lies Mr Sarkozy's irritation at the rock-star welcome that Europe gave Mr Obama on his Europan tour earlier this month.
The American President's call "to free the world of the menace of a nuclear nightmare" was hot air, Mr Sarkozy's diplomatic staff told him in a report. "It was rhetoric – not a speech on American security policy but an export model aimed at improving the image of the United States," they said.
Most of Mr Obama's proposals had already been made by the Bush administration and Washington was dragging its feet on disarmament and treaties against nuclear proliferation, the leaked report said.
Personal pique and French politics are also behind the souring of Mr Sarkozy's self-promoted honeymoon with the United States. On the personal side, the French President is needled by the adulation for an unproven US leader whose stardom has eclipsed what he sees as his established record as a world troubleshooter.
"The President is annoyed by what he sees as the naivety and the herd mentality of the media," said a journalist who is privy to Elysée thinking.
(Sarkozy rocks!)
Posted in Politics | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Posted in Religion | Permalink | Comments (4) | TrackBack (0)
Posted in Politics | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)
Posted in Politics | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)
There I was, at the airport, just minding my own business. Shopping in the airport gift shop, looking to spend six or seven dollars for a pack of gum when I notice a brightly colored package on the counter. And there it was, a pack of chocolate bars (CHOCOLATE BARS, PEOPLE!!!) with the name and visage of The One on it, looking all serious and stuff. I asked the cashier (a lovely Moroccan man who calls his mother in Morocco nearly every day, or so he said. Yes, we actually had a brief chat; I'm just a people person, I guess.) if he would mind if I took a photo of this most impressive pack of chocolate bars. My Moroccan friend said, not at all, so here it is. For your viewing pleasure. I regret a few things about this moment. I regret not finding out how much this goes for. I regret not reading the ingredients; as a chocolate lover, I would easily know if the chocolate is any good and I regret that I did not surreptitiously pick up the two packs of chocolates and move them next to the laxatives or perhaps, feminine hygiene products. What on Earth was I thinking?
Posted in Culture | Permalink | Comments (15) | TrackBack (0)
Just days ago Obama landed in Baghdad for a surprise visit.
For some reason the media payed little attention to the thousands who protested Obama in Turkey.
Turkish demonstrators step on a poster of U.S. President Barack Obama during a protest in Istanbul April 7, 2009. (REUTERS/Gurcan Ozturk)
Posted in Politics | Permalink | Comments (5) | TrackBack (0)
Posted in Politics | Permalink | Comments (5) | TrackBack (0)
Posted in Politics | Permalink | Comments (4) | TrackBack (0)
"I, I, I ummmm, I'm really, ummm, I, I, I'm, ummmm, not that, ummmm, not that bright"
The question that flummoxed the great orator- Guardian
Barack Obama, the World's Greatest Orator (™all news organisations), didn't exactly cover himself in glory when the BBC's political editor Nick Robinson asked him a question about who was to blame for the financial crisis. Normally word perfect, Obama ummed, ahed and waffled for the best part of two and a half minutes. Here, John Crace decodes what he was really thinking ...
Nick Robinson: "A question for you both, if I may. The prime minister has repeatedly blamed the United States of America for causing this crisis. France and Germany both blame Britain and America for causing this crisis. Who is right? And isn't the debate about that at the heart of the debate about what to do now?"
Brown immediately swivels to leave Obama in pole position. There is a four-second delay before Obama starts speaking [THANKS FOR NOTHING, GORDY BABY. REMIND ME TO HANG YOU OUT TO DRY ONE DAY.] Barack Obama: "I, I, would say that, er ... pause [I HAVEN'T A CLUE] ... if you look at ... pause [WHO IS THIS NICK ROBINSON JERK?] ... the, the sources of this crisis ... pause [JUST KEEP GOING, BUDDY] ... the United States certainly has some accounting to do with respect to . . . pause [I'M IN WAY TOO DEEP HERE] ... a regulatory system that was inadequate to the massive changes that have taken place in the global financial system ... pause, close eyes [THIS IS GOING TO GO DOWN LIKE A CROCK OF SHIT BACK HOME. HELP]. I think what is also true is that ... pause [I WANT NICK ROBINSON TO DISAPPEAR] ... here in Great Britain ... pause [SHIT, GORDY'S THE HOST, DON'T LAND HIM IN IT] ... here in continental Europe ... pause [DAMN IT, BLAME EVERYONE.] ... around the world. We were seeing the same mismatch between the regulatory regimes that were in place and er ... pause [I'VE LOST MY TRAIN OF THOUGHT AGAIN] ... the highly integrated, er, global capital markets that have emerged ... pause [I'M REALLY WINGING IT NOW]. So at this point, I'm less interested in ... pause [YOU]... identifying blame than fixing the problem. I think we've taken some very aggressive steps in the United States to do so, not just responding to the immediate crisis, ensuring banks are adequately capitalised, er, dealing with the enormous, er ... pause [WHY DIDN'T I QUIT WHILE I WAS AHEAD?] ... drop-off in demand and contraction that has taken place. More importantly, for the long term, making sure that we've got a set of, er, er, regulations that are up to the task, er, and that includes, er, a number that will be discussed at this summit. I think there's a lot of convergence between all the parties involved about the need, for example, to focus not on the legal form that a particular financial product takes or the institution it emerges from, but rather what's the risk involved, what's the function of this product and how do we regulate that adequately, much more effective coordination, er, between countries so we can, er, anticipate the risks that are involved there. Dealing with the, er, problem of derivatives markets, making sure we have set up systems, er, that can reduce some of the risks there. So, I actually think ... pause [FANTASTIC. I'VE LOST EVERYONE, INCLUDING MYSELF] ... there's enormous consensus that has emerged in terms of what we need to do now and, er ... pause [I'M OUTTA HERE. TIME FOR THE USUAL CLOSING BOLLOCKS] ... I'm a great believer in looking forwards than looking backwards.
ZIP
H/T:Brent
Posted in Politics | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)
Michael Hussey created this video and uploaded it to Youtube last year.
Posted in Politics | Permalink | Comments (4) | TrackBack (0)

On this holiday, Jews all over the world, retell the story of the Exodus and celebrate G-d leading our ancestors out of Egypt, out of slavery. We also remember those around the world who are not free today. May we continue to work towards repairing the world (tikkun olam) and bringing peace and freedom to those who are oppressed.
Next year in Jerusalem!
Posted in Religion | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Stunning Carla Bruni was business-like in her greeting — while her hubby treated the US President's wife to a hug and Continental double kiss.
The former model gave customary pecks on both cheeks to Michelle Obama and other dignitaries when the couple arrived in France.
But when it came to the dashing US President the beauty kept a noticeable distance.

Peck on the cheek ... warm greetings
Mr and Mrs Obama flew in to Strasbourg's majestic 18th-century Rohan Palace this morning to meet with President Nicolas Sarkozy and German Chancellor Angela Merkel.
The meeting was being held before the formal start of the NATO alliance’s 60th anniversary summit.
Sarkozy rolled out all the pomp possible for the visit, with a red carpet arrival and full military honours from a company of soldiers dressed in camouflage.
The two couples lined up to listen to their respective national anthems played by a French military band but even in his trademark stacked heels Mr Sarkozy was a sight for smaller eyes.

Posted in Politics | Permalink | Comments (8) | TrackBack (0)
Take a good hard look at the single most shameful moment in American history.
Posted in Politics | Permalink | Comments (7) | TrackBack (0)
Rick Francona - Mar 25, 2009
Middle East Perspectives
Both American and Israeli intelligence establishments believe that Iran is intent on developing nuclear weapons. The difference between the two assessments is how soon Iran will achieve that capability. The Israelis believe the Iranians are on the verge of developing a nuclear warhead for its ballistic missiles - missiles that can easily reach anywhere in Israel.
Press reports described Ashkenazi`s reception in Washington as "extraordinarily cool" - he did not meet with any of the Obama Cabinet, including Secretary of Defense Robert Gates. He also was unable to schedule a meeting with his counterpart, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Mike Mullen. Add to that list Director of National Intelligence Admiral Dennis Blair.
This is almost unheard of. The United States and Israel have close military and intelligence ties. It is quite normal for the IDF chief to meet with defense and intelligence officers. Keep in mind that in Israel, the defense establishment is the senior intelligence authority, making Ashkenazi not only Admiral Mullen`s counterpart, but Admiral Blair`s as well. Meetings such as those that did not happen are commonplace, at least they were.
What has changed? Obviously, we have a new administration whose foreign policy is somewhat changed. The unavailability of virtually any senior official is telling. This administration appears to have determined that forging a new relationship with Iran may come at the expense of the close relationship with Israel that goes back decades.
The only meeting with a senior American official was with National Security Advisor General James Jones. However, the meeting was focused on U.S. demands that Israel lift some military restrictions on the West Bank and in the Gaza Strip. Jones was not there to listen to anything about what Israeli leaders considers an "existential" threat to the Jewish state.
The IDF spokesman tried to soften the blow with this emailed explanation, "The schedule for the United States visit of the IDF Chief of the General Staff, Lt. Gen. Gabi Ashkenazi, was preplanned according to requests made by American officials. Any meetings that were canceled were substituted with telephone conference calls." An IDF internet site claimed that Ashkenazi returned to Israel to participate in talks revolving around the negotiations for captured Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit.
Conference calls? I`m not buying it. This treatment of General Ashkenazi is a not-so-subtle message to the Israelis: the situation has changed and you may be on your own in dealing with the Iranians.
How else can the Israelis interpret it? Obama has made several overtures to the Iranians - a terrorist country (unless you ask Janet Napolitano, then it is a "state sponsor of human-caused disasters") according to the State Department - all of which have been rebuffed. Obama advisors are urging the President to talk to not only the Taliban (a terrorist organization), but also Hizballah and Hamas (also terrorist organizations). As one analyst (that would be me) puts it, "We are trying to talk to the exact people we should be trying to kill."
Rather than dissuading the Israelis from a military strike on Iran`s nuclear facilities, the Obama Administration`s refusal to talk to senior Israeli military and intelligence officials may actually hasten the action they seek to stop. If Israel cannot get some assurance of support from the United States, it will feel compelled to act unilaterally.
Mr. President, you are talking to the wrong people.
Posted in Politics | Permalink | Comments (3) | TrackBack (0)
This says it all.
Oh, and Obama banned the press... again:
The president banned most reporters from nearly every event he held on a day busy with bilateral talks with foreign leaders, and even held cameras at bay for his visit to Buckingham Palace to meet the queen.
What Does One Get a Queen?- ABC News
President and First Lady Obama gave Her Royal Highness Queen Elizabeth II a video iPod with inscription, songs uploaded and accessories, plus a rare musical songbook signed by Richard Rodgers.
Uploaded onto the iPod:
- Photos from the Queen's 2007 White House State Visit
- Photos from the Queen's 2007 Jamestown, Va., Visit
- Photos from the Queen's 2007 Richmond, Va., Visit
- Video from the Queen's 1957 Jamestown Visit
- Video from the Queen's 2007 Jamestown Visit
- Video from the Queen's 2007 Richmond Visit
- Photos from President Obama's Inauguration
- Audio of then-state senator Obama's speech at the 2004 Democratic National Convention, and
- Audio of President Obama 2009 Inauguration Address
Britain's Press Association reports that the Royal couple gave the Obamas "a silver-framed, signed photograph of themselves."
ZIP (How long do you think it took for the Queen to order the thing thrown away stored?)
(Wake up, folks. Michelle Obama is NOT Jackie Kennedy. She's not even Carla Bruni. President and Mrs. Bush may not have been the most stylish folks in town but they actually DID know how to conduct themselves among world leaders. World leaders, and the Dalai Lama, liked President Bush a great deal; it was the unwashed masses who were brainwashed against him. Now, it is world leaders who think Obama is an idiot and the unwashed masses who fancy him a deity. Sheesh!)
Here's video from the meeting with the Queen of England. It is customary for a lady to curtsy when she meets the Queen.
Michelle forgot to curtsy. Perhaps she thought it was the Queen who was supposed to curtsy for her!
Posted in Politics | Permalink | Comments (7) | TrackBack (0)
--

In just 24 hours, Congress will begin voting on President Obama's budget. It's a big test not only for President Obama, but for our entire movement. Taking just a few minutes to call Congress now could make a major impact on this crucial vote.
Will you call your elected representatives to let them know you support a budget that tackles the long-term challenges to our prosperity?
With this vote, we have a historic opportunity to create jobs, restore
our economy, and invest in energy, health care, and education for our
future.
Don't let this important moment slip away. Pick up the phone for President Obama today:
http://my.barackobama.com/
Thank you,
Mitch
Mitch Stewart
Director
Organizing for America
(Okay, friends, I am guessing you don't need me to tell you to call your elected representatives and tell them where YOU stand right away! And please, by all means, call the TOTUS and leave a message!)
Posted in Politics | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Recent Comments